SDG 16 : Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions


Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.

Strong Institutions: A Measure of Good Governance

Good governance relates to consistent management of an organization or country. It provides for proper oversight and accountability regarding budgets, power-sharing, and transfer of leadership.

Since year 2000, the international community has talked about two goals on the topic of governance. The first one is the quality of institutions with references to democratic values. The second one is peace and security. Today, we understand and accept these two goals to be one under SDG 16.

Conflict Prevention for Peace

Diverse groups within a country want access to government power and hope to legitimately benefit from national resources.

If public institutions could guarantee sharing power and resources by different groups, then inclusiveness and peace would be an easy deal. Discouragingly, persistent inequalities, especially with an ethnic dimension, are one of the motivations for civil war. Additionally, if a local conflict crosses the border due to disputed territory, resources, diaspora, or refugees; than the situation leads to interstate war.

The cost of internal spill-overs from one country to another are high. More importantly, the social impacts of conflict last several generations, regardless of aid and intervention. Examples include, refugee crises and human trafficking, lack of government services and unregistered populations (without valid identities).

Accountable Institutions at the Global Level

Finally, globalization itself has created a level of economic interdependence among multiple countries and communities. Generally speaking, we view this interdependence as a positive relationship. In particular, economic interdependence often discourages potential opponents from waging war. Free from war, we have time to build institutions that provide services for a functioning society and economy.

Unfortunately, disputes concerning firms, resources, and trade between countries are impossible to avoid. In asymmetric engagements, such as that between donor and receiving countries, we see exploitation as a persistent political accountability problem at the international level.

Corporations and Accountability

Traditionally, the main actors of these partnerships were governments, multilateral organizations, and regional cooperation (EU). Sustainability implementation was limited; because private interests could override political decisions. More recently, companies have also started coming on board to implement sustainability targets. 

The 2008 financial crisis increased interest in corporate governance practices. Stakeholders began to question corporate objectives pursued in other countries. It has become more important to assess the social impact of market decisions since 2008.  

Luckily in the post-SDGs era, interdependence and partnerships have increased demands for global accountability in legal, fiscal, and market-related areas. But the global arena is far from a process of democratic decisionmaking.

Therefore, our system’s most significant challenge to SDG 16 is to keep certain interests from dominating others.

Share this :


Leave a Reply

You have successfully subscribed to the newsletter

There was an error while trying to send your request. Please try again.

2030 Builders will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing.